{"id":254,"date":"2025-01-31T16:11:34","date_gmt":"2025-01-31T17:11:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ezcpv.com\/?p=254"},"modified":"2025-02-17T14:38:14","modified_gmt":"2025-02-17T14:38:14","slug":"letters-stop-the-inflation-erosion-of-colorados-property-tax-break-for-seniors","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/ezcpv.com\/index.php\/2025\/01\/31\/letters-stop-the-inflation-erosion-of-colorados-property-tax-break-for-seniors\/","title":{"rendered":"Letters: Stop the \u201cinflation erosion\u201d of Colorado\u2019s property tax break for seniors"},"content":{"rendered":"

Tax exemption doesn’t keep up with valuation<\/h4>\n

I’m 82 years old. I’ve lived in the same house for almost 30 years. I receive a partial property tax exemption every year. When this program started in 2004, my house was worth about $150,000. The property tax exemption was introduced at $100,000. What a great deal! Today, my house is worth just over $460,000. An increase of about 200%. And today, 20-plus years later, the exemption is $100,000, an increase of about, uh … ZERO! What’s up with that?<\/p>\n

Why wouldn’t the exemption rate at least keep up with inflation or somehow be tied to your home’s value?<\/p>\n

I urge you to contact your state legislator about this state of affairs. There are websites you can use to find your legislators: one of them is leg.colorado.gov, and there are others. I have written them myself a few times, and they do reply (sometimes) — “Well, yes, that is something we should maybe look into,” etc. Maybe if enough of us seniors bring this to their attention, something will get done.<\/p>\n

Bruce Badger, Loveland<\/em><\/p>\n

What is winning for CU Buffs?<\/h4>\n

Re: “Prime is face of university that can’t afford to lose him<\/a>,” Jan. 28 sports commentary<\/p>\n

It seems CU is facing quite a dilemma. Do they want a winning coach or a winning football team? It doesn\u2019t seem possible to have both. However, in this age where the noun \u201cinfluencer\u201d is also a job title, perhaps the writing is already written on the Facebook wall.<\/p>\n

Bob Priddy, Westminster<\/em><\/p>\n

Get real about energy codes’ benefits vs. costs<\/h4>\n

Re: “Senate GOP takes aim at fees, regulations<\/a>,” Jan. 15 news story<\/p>\n

The story reported exaggerated claims about the costs and values of energy codes. It\u2019s no surprise that the National Association of Home Builders and certain politicians would inflate and exaggerate the cost estimates for building safer, sturdier, healthier, and more energy-efficient homes — it\u2019s in the home builders\u2019 financial interest to roll back building codes so they can build as cheaply as possible while still selling for as much as possible. It is surprising that some of our elected officials in the statehouse so readily accept this spin and can\u2019t tell the difference between builder profitability and home affordability.<\/p>\n

I\u2019m an architect who designs all-electric buildings and energy-efficient homes. The real costs of new homes aren\u2019t determined by the building codes \u2013 even those requiring more energy efficiency. They are determined by supply and demand, land costs, labor costs, location, school quality, neighborhood attractiveness, and amenities.<\/p>\n

Rolling back building energy codes actually makes home affordability worse by increasing the utility bills we have to shell out month after month for the entire lifespan of each new home.<\/p>\n

We want our elected officials to address the root causes of our housing affordability crisis \u2013 not fall for overly simplistic red herrings.<\/p>\n

Ron Bennett, Boulder<\/em><\/p>\n

Get the Rockies in the hunt<\/h4>\n

Re: “Rockies say they’re “closer” to turning corner this year<\/a>,” Jan. 26 sports story<\/p>\n

It\u2019s time Rockies management stop boo-hooing about not being able to compete financially against the Dodgers and Padres. Fans aren\u2019t asking ownership to spend that kind of money. What fans want is pretty simple: Be competitive for the lowest wild card spot in September.<\/p>\n